BEFORE YOU READ THE ABSTRACT OR CHAPTER ONE OF THE PROJECT TOPICS BELOW, PLEASE READ THE INFORMATION BELOW.THANK YOU!
INFORMATION:
YOU CAN GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT OF THE TOPIC BELOW. THE FULL PROJECT COST N5,000 ONLY. THE FULL INFORMATION ON HOW TO PAY AND GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT IS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE. OR
YOU CAN CALL: 08068231953, 08137701720
WHATSAPP US ON: 08137701720
DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC GROWTH IN YENAGOA METROPOLIS
ABSTRACT
This work discusses demographic change and socio-economic growth in yenagoa metropolis. A hundred and twenty questionnaires were distributed among people from yenagoa metropolis. Interviews and surveys were also conducted.
Primary and secondary data will be used in the analysis. Tables and percentages will also be used as the instrument of analysis
It will be observed therefore that population density, population growth, population distribution have a strong and significant impact on socio-economic development.
TABLE OF CONTENT:
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study
1.2 Statement of the Research Problem
1.3 Objectives of the Study
1.4 Significance of the Study
1.5 Research Questions
1.6 Research Hypothesis
1.7 Conceptual and Operational Definition
1.8 Assumptions
1.9 Limitations of the Study
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Sources of Literature
2.2 The Review
2.3 Summary of Literature Review
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Research Method
3.2 Research Design
3.3 Research Sample
3.4 Measuring Instrument
3.5 Data Collection
3.6 Data Analysis
3.7 Expected Result
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA ANALYSIS AND RESULTS
4.1 Data Analysis
4.2 Results
4.3 Discussion
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Summary
5.2 Recommendations for Further Study
Bibliography
HOW TO RECEIVE PROJECT MATERIAL (S)
After paying the appropriate amount (#5,000) into our bank Account below, send the following information to
08068231953 or 08168759420
(1) Your project topics
(2) Email Address
(3) Payment Name
OR you drop them on our WhatsApp, 08137701720
We will send your material(s) after we receive bank alert
BANK ACCOUNTS
Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI
Account Number: 0046579864
Bank: GTBank.
OR
Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI
Account Number: 3139283609
Bank: FIRST BANK
FOR MORE INFORMATION, CALL:
08068231953 or 08168759420
]]>BEFORE YOU READ THE ABSTRACT OR CHAPTER ONE OF THE PROJECT TOPICS BELOW, PLEASE READ THE INFORMATION BELOW.THANK YOU!
INFORMATION:
YOU CAN GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT OF THE TOPIC BELOW. THE FULL PROJECT COST N5,000 ONLY. THE FULL INFORMATION ON HOW TO PAY AND GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT IS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE. OR
YOU CAN CALL: 08068231953, 08137701720
WHATSAPP US ON: 08137701720
CHALLENGES AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT IN MODIBO ADAMA UNIVERSITY YOLA. A CASE STUDY
Abstract:
Solid waste management poses significant challenges with far-reaching environmental implications in academic institutions, and Modibo Adama University Yola serves as a case study for this research. The study aims to comprehensively investigate the challenges associated with solid waste management within the university campus and explore the environmental consequences of current waste management practices.
Employing a mixed-methods approach, the research combines quantitative data through waste audits and surveys with qualitative insights gained through interviews and focus group discussions. The study identifies key challenges such as inadequate waste infrastructure, insufficient waste segregation practices, and limited awareness among the university community regarding sustainable waste management.
The environmental implications of these challenges are then assessed, considering factors such as air and water pollution, soil degradation, and the overall ecological impact on the university’s surroundings. The research also evaluates the potential health risks associated with poor waste management practices within the campus environment.
Furthermore, the study proposes sustainable solutions and best practices to address the identified challenges, emphasizing the importance of waste reduction, recycling, and community engagement. Recommendations for policy improvements and the implementation of environmentally friendly waste management strategies are also provided.
This research contributes valuable insights into the complexities of solid waste management within academic institutions, shedding light on the specific challenges faced by Modibo Adama University Yola. The findings aim to inform sustainable waste management policies and practices, promoting a cleaner and healthier campus environment while mitigating the broader environmental impact.
HOW TO RECEIVE PROJECT MATERIAL (S)
After paying the appropriate amount (#5,000) into our bank Account below, send the following information to
08068231953 or 08168759420
(1) Your project topics
(2) Email Address
(3) Payment Name
OR you drop them on our WhatsApp, 08137701720
We will send your material(s) after we receive bank alert
BANK ACCOUNTS
Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI
Account Number: 0046579864
Bank: GTBank.
OR
Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI
Account Number: 3139283609
Bank: FIRST BANK
FOR MORE INFORMATION, CALL:
08068231953 or 08168759420
]]>BEFORE YOU READ THE ABSTRACT OR CHAPTER ONE OF THE PROJECT TOPICS BELOW, PLEASE READ THE INFORMATION BELOW.THANK YOU!
INFORMATION:
YOU CAN GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT OF THE TOPIC BELOW. THE FULL PROJECT COST N5,000 ONLY. THE FULL INFORMATION ON HOW TO PAY AND GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT IS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE. OR
YOU CAN CALL: 08068231953, 08137701720
WHATSAPP US ON: 08137701720
AQUIFER HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS AND VULNERABILITY ESTIMATION FROM VERTICAL ELECTRICAL SOUNDING: A CASE STUDY OF ORU AND ENVIRONS,SOUTH EASTERN NIGERIA
Abstract:
Aquifer hydraulic characteristics and vulnerability assessment are essential for sustainable groundwater management, particularly in regions facing increasing water demands and environmental stresses. This study focuses on the estimation of aquifer hydraulic parameters and vulnerability using Vertical Electrical Sounding (VES) data in the Oru and its environs, located in South Eastern Nigeria.
Vertical Electrical Sounding is a geophysical technique widely used for subsurface investigations, particularly in hydrogeological studies. In this research, VES data were collected at strategic locations within the study area. The data were interpreted using the Schlumberger array to derive the aquifer parameters, including the hydraulic conductivity (K) and transmissivity (T).
The results reveal spatial variations in aquifer hydraulic characteristics across the study area. The estimated values of hydraulic conductivity and transmissivity provide valuable insights into the potential groundwater yield and flow characteristics of the aquifer system in Oru and its environs. Additionally, the vulnerability of the aquifer to contamination was assessed using the DRASTIC method, which considers various factors such as Depth to Water Table (D), Net Recharge (R), Aquifer Media (A), Soil Media (S), Topography (T), Impact of Vadose Zone (I), and Hydraulic Conductivity (C).
The vulnerability assessment indicates areas of varying degrees of vulnerability to contamination, highlighting zones where groundwater resources are at higher risk. These findings are crucial for groundwater resource management, land-use planning, and the development of appropriate mitigation measures to protect the aquifer system.
This study contributes to the existing knowledge by providing a case study of aquifer hydraulic characteristics and vulnerability assessment using VES data in South Eastern Nigeria. The results offer valuable insights for policymakers, water resource managers, and stakeholders in sustainable groundwater management practices in the region.
Keywords: Aquifer Hydraulic Characteristics, Vertical Electrical Sounding, Vulnerability Assessment, Hydraulic Conductivity, Transmissivity, DRASTIC Method, Groundwater Management, South Eastern Nigeria.
Chapter 1: Introduction
• Background of the Study
• Statement of the Problem
• Research Objectives
• Research Questions
• Significance of the Study
• Scope and Limitations
• Organization of the Study
Chapter 2: Literature Review
• Hydrogeological Setting of South Eastern Nigeria
• Aquifer Types and Characteristics
• Vertical Electrical Sounding (VES) as a Geophysical Method
• Estimation of Aquifer Parameters using VES
• Vulnerability Assessment of Aquifers
• Previous Studies on Aquifer Hydraulic Characteristics and Vulnerability Estimation
• Gaps in Literature and Research Questions
Chapter 3: Methodology
• Study Area: Oru and Environs, South Eastern Nigeria
• Data Collection: Vertical Electrical Sounding (VES)
• Equipment Used
• Data Acquisition Procedure
• Data Analysis: Interpretation of VES Data
• Schlumberger Array
• Estimation of Aquifer Parameters (Hydraulic Conductivity, Transmissivity)
• Vulnerability Assessment
• DRASTIC Method
• Factors Considered: Depth to Water Table, Net Recharge, Aquifer Media, Soil Media, Topography, Impact of Vadose Zone, Hydraulic Conductivity
• Validation of Results
• Ethical Considerations
Chapter 4: Results and Discussion
• Overview of VES Data Collection Points
• Interpretation of VES Data
• Aquifer Hydraulic Characteristics
• Hydraulic Conductivity (K) Distribution
• Transmissivity (T) Distribution
• Vulnerability Assessment Results
• DRASTIC Vulnerability Map
• Vulnerability Zones and Ratings
• Comparison with Previous Studies
• Discussion of Findings
• Spatial Variations in Hydraulic Characteristics
• Implications for Groundwater Management
• Areas of High Vulnerability and Mitigation Strategies
Chapter 5: Conclusion and Recommendations
• Summary of Findings
• Contributions to Knowledge
• Implications for Groundwater Management
• Recommendations for Policy and Practice
• Future Research Directions
• Conclusion
HOW TO RECEIVE PROJECT MATERIAL (S)
After paying the appropriate amount (#5,000) into our bank Account below, send the following information to
08068231953 or 08168759420
(1) Your project topics
(2) Email Address
(3) Payment Name
OR you drop them on our WhatsApp, 08137701720
We will send your material(s) after we receive bank alert
BANK ACCOUNTS
Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI
Account Number: 0046579864
Bank: GTBank.
OR
Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI
Account Number: 3139283609
Bank: FIRST BANK
FOR MORE INFORMATION, CALL:
08068231953 or 08168759420
]]>BEFORE YOU READ THE ABSTRACT OR CHAPTER ONE OF THE PROJECT TOPICS BELOW, PLEASE READ THE INFORMATION BELOW.THANK YOU!
INFORMATION:
YOU CAN GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT OF THE TOPIC BELOW. THE FULL PROJECT COST N5,000 ONLY. THE FULL INFORMATION ON HOW TO PAY AND GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT IS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE. OR
YOU CAN CALL: 08068231953, 08137701720
WHATSAPP US ON: 08137701720
PRODUCTION OF BIOGAS FROM THE ANAEROBIC CONGESTION OF COW DUNG ABD SOME CEREAL WASTE USING SODIUM AND CALCIUM ALGINATES
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
Abstract:
The escalating demand for sustainable energy sources has fueled the exploration of innovative technologies for renewable energy production. This study focuses on the production of biogas through the anaerobic digestion of cow dung and cereal waste, employing sodium and calcium alginates as immobilization agents. Cow dung, a widely available organic waste, and cereal waste are chosen as feedstocks for their abundance and potential to contribute to the circular economy. Sodium and calcium alginates are utilized to immobilize anaerobic bacteria, aiming to enhance biogas production efficiency. The research investigates the optimal conditions for biogas production, assessing the impact of substrate composition, immobilization agent concentration, and process parameters. Laboratory-scale experiments are conducted to analyze biogas yield, composition, and the economic and environmental feasibility of the proposed system. The outcomes of this study contribute to the knowledge base on sustainable waste-to-energy technologies, providing insights into the viability of utilizing locally available waste materials for efficient biogas production.
1.1 Background of the Study
The global quest for sustainable and renewable energy sources has intensified in response to environmental concerns, energy security, and the need to reduce dependence on non-renewable fossil fuels. Biogas, produced through the anaerobic digestion of organic waste materials, has emerged as a promising renewable energy option. Among the various feedstocks available for biogas production, cow dung and cereal waste stand out due to their abundance and widespread availability. This research focuses on harnessing the potential of biogas production through the anaerobic digestion of a blend of cow dung and cereal waste, utilizing sodium and calcium alginates as immobilization agents.
The ever-growing global energy demand, coupled with environmental concerns and the imperative to transition towards sustainable energy sources, has spurred research into alternative and renewable energy technologies. Biogas, a versatile and eco-friendly energy resource, is produced through the anaerobic digestion of organic materials. Among the potential feedstocks, cow dung and cereal waste emerge as promising candidates due to their widespread availability and rich organic content. This research focuses on harnessing the energy potential of these organic wastes through anaerobic digestion, with a unique approach involving the use of sodium and calcium alginates as immobilization agents.
1.1 Background
Biogas production through anaerobic digestion has gained considerable attention as a sustainable means of converting organic waste into energy. Cow dung, a byproduct of livestock farming, is rich in organic matter and represents a significant source of untapped energy. Cereal waste, often discarded as agricultural byproducts or post-harvest residues, similarly possesses substantial organic content suitable for anaerobic digestion. The integration of these materials in biogas production aligns with the principles of circular economy and waste-to-energy conversion.
Despite the promise of cow dung and cereal waste as viable feedstocks, optimizing biogas production efficiency remains a challenge. This study addresses this gap by introducing sodium and calcium alginates as immobilization agents. Immobilization agents play a crucial role in enhancing the activity and stability of anaerobic bacteria responsible for biogas production. Sodium and calcium alginates, derived from natural seaweed sources, are chosen for their biocompatibility and potential to improve the overall anaerobic digestion process.
1.2 Statement of the Problem
The global energy landscape faces challenges such as environmental degradation, depletion of fossil fuels, and the contribution of conventional energy sources to climate change. Biogas production offers an eco-friendly alternative by utilizing organic waste materials. However, the efficiency of biogas production, especially from cow dung and cereal waste, can be influenced by various factors, including substrate composition and process optimization. This study seeks to address these challenges and contribute to the advancement of biogas technology through the use of sodium and calcium alginates as immobilization agents.
1.3 Objectives of the Study
The primary objectives of this research are as follows:
To investigate the potential of biogas production from the anaerobic digestion of cow dung and cereal waste.
To assess the impact of sodium and calcium alginates as immobilization agents on biogas production efficiency.
To optimize the anaerobic digestion process parameters for enhanced biogas yield.
To evaluate the environmental and economic feasibility of biogas production using cow dung and cereal waste.
1.4 Research Questions
This study will address the following research questions:
What is the potential for biogas production from the anaerobic digestion of cow dung and cereal waste?
How do sodium and calcium alginates as immobilization agents influence the efficiency of biogas production?
What are the optimal process parameters for maximizing biogas yield in the anaerobic digestion of cow dung and cereal waste?
What are the environmental and economic implications of biogas production from these organic waste materials?
1.5 Justification of the Study
The use of cow dung and cereal waste for biogas production aligns with the principles of waste-to-energy conversion, offering an environmentally sustainable solution for waste management. The immobilization of anaerobic bacteria using sodium and calcium alginates presents an innovative approach to enhance biogas production efficiency. This research contributes to the growing body of knowledge on renewable energy technologies and provides insights into the feasibility of utilizing locally available waste materials for biogas production.
1.6 Scope of the Study
This study will focus on the production of biogas through the anaerobic digestion of cow dung and cereal waste, employing sodium and calcium alginates as immobilization agents. The research will investigate the optimal conditions for biogas production, considering factors such as substrate composition, immobilization agent concentration, and process parameters. Laboratory-scale experiments will be conducted to analyze biogas yield, composition, and the economic and environmental aspects of the proposed system.
1.7 Significance of the Study
The significance of this study lies in its potential to:
Contribute to the understanding of biogas production using cow dung and cereal waste.
Provide insights into the influence of immobilization agents on anaerobic digestion efficiency.
Optimize process parameters for enhanced biogas yield.
Contribute to sustainable waste management practices by converting organic waste into a valuable energy resource.
1.8 Organization of the Thesis
The remainder of this thesis is organized as follows:
Chapter Two: Literature Review
Chapter Three: Research Methodology
Chapter Four: Data Analysis and Results
Chapter Five: Discussion and Findings
Each chapter will address specific aspects of the research, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of the production of biogas from the anaerobic digestion of cow dung and cereal waste using sodium and calcium alginates.
HOW TO RECEIVE PROJECT MATERIAL (S)
After paying the appropriate amount (#5,000) into our bank Account below, send the following information to
08068231953 or 08168759420
(1) Your project topics
(2) Email Address
(3) Payment Name
OR you drop them on our WhatsApp, 08137701720
We will send your material(s) after we receive bank alert
BANK ACCOUNTS
Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI
Account Number: 0046579864
Bank: GTBank.
OR
Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI
Account Number: 3139283609
Bank: FIRST BANK
FOR MORE INFORMATION, CALL:
08068231953 or 08168759420
]]>BEFORE YOU READ THE ABSTRACT OR CHAPTER ONE OF THE PROJECT TOPIC BELOW, PLEASE READ THE INFORMATION BELOW.THANK YOU!
INFORMATION:
YOU CAN GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT OF THE TOPIC BELOW. THE FULL PROJECT COSTS N5,000 ONLY. THE FULL INFORMATION ON HOW TO PAY AND GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT IS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE. OR YOU CAN CALL: 08068231953, 08168759420
WHATSAPP US ON 08137701720
GAS DEHYDRATION USING TRIETHYLENE GLYCOL (A CASE STUDY OF SHELL, UGHELI)
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
Background of the study
Natural gas is a combustible gaseous mixture of gaseous hydrocarbons, very light liquid hydrocarbons, free water, water vapour and other undesirable non – hydrocarbon gaseous and solid compounds found in conventional natural gas reservoirs as non-associated gas (NAG), as associated gas (AG) or as gas condensates.
Associated gas or gas-wellhead-gas is found in contact with oil in the reservoir and is produced with the oil and separated at the casing head or wellhead whereas non- associated gas contains little or no natural gas liquids (oil) at reservoir condition and it is termed dry gas or lean gas if the fluid at the surface still remains gas. However if the surface pressure cause some liquid hydrocarbon to evolve, it is called a wet gas or rich. Condensate occurs not as liquid or gas but as a very dense and high pressure fluid due to its high pressure and high temperature reservoir condition.
Natural gas may also occur in tight sands, tight shales, methane gas occluded in coal, as gas hydrates in geo-pressurized acquifer and as deep gas. These gases are more technologically difficult or more expensive to produce than conventional gas and are termed non- conventional natural gas.
Hydrocarbon majorly contained in the natural gas mixtures are methane and ethane which exist as gaseous components, propane and butane existing as volatile fluid, pentane, small amount of hexanes and heavier components existing as liquid components. Typical non- hydrocarbon which may exist in the gas stream are solid particles, water vapour or free water, mercury, formaldehyde, benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene (collectively referred to as BTEX), undesirable gases such as carbon oxides, sulfur gases and nitrogen oxides (collectively called acid gases), oxygen, helium and naturally occurring radioactive materials such as radon.
Table 1.0: Typical composition of Natural gas
Name Formula Volume (%)
Methane CH4 >85
Ethane C2H6 3-8
Propane C3H8 1-2
Butane C4H10 <1
Pentane C5H12 <1
Carbon dioxide CO2 1-2
Hydrogen sulfide H2O <1
Nitrogen N2 1-5
Helium He <0.5
Mercury Hg Traces
Benzene C6H6 Traces
Toulene C7H8 Traces
Xylene C6H4(CH3)2 Traces
Natural gas is a fossil fuel composed almost entirely of methane. The composition of natural gas varies depending on the field, formation, or reservoir from which it is extracted. Natural gas which contains acid gases above customer’s specification is termed sour gas while Natural gas containing acid gas below customer’s specification or no acid gas is termed sweet gas.
Natural gas is a fossil fuel formed by either the biogenic or thermogenic degradation of organic matter which has been accumulated over time within the earth’s crust. Biogenic mechanism involves shallow depth and low temperature decomposition of sedimentary organic matter by anaerobic bacterials whereas thermogenic mechanism involves deeper depth and high temperature thermal cracking of sedimentary matter or oil into gas. Natural gas being a fossil fuel is today, one of the most important fuels in our lives as it is the source of energy for household, industrial and commercial use, as well as to generate electricity.
Natural, associated or tail gas usually contains water, in liquid and/or vapour form, at source and/or as a result of sweetening with an acqueous solution. Operating experience and thorough engineering have proved that it is necessary to reduce and control the water content of gas to ensure safe processing and transmission. This is accomplished by the process of dehydration.
1.1 NATURAL GAS DEHYDRATION PROCESSES
Natural gas dehydration is the removal of water or water vapour from the natural gas stream. Free water in natural gas gives rise to difficulties in production, handling and transmission of natural gas. It is therefore necessary that water be removed from the gas stream as soon as possible.
There are several methods of dehydrating natural gas but the most common of these methods are:
(i)Refrigeration
(ii)Adsorption
(iii)Absorption
1.11 REFRIGERATION
This method employs cooling the natural gas to condense the water molecules to the liquid phase with the subsequent injection of inhibitor to prevent hydrate formation.
1.12 ADSORPTION
This is the removal of water from the gas stream by solid materials called desiccants which take in and hold water molecules within themselves by adhesive forces. Several types of solid desiccant used are silica gel, silica-based beads, activated alumina, activated bauxite, membranes and molecular sieves.
1.13 ABSORBTION
This is the process whereby water or water vapour is removed or absorbed from the gas stream by intimate contact with a liquid desiccant. Of all the liquid desiccants, the glycols have proved to be the most effective in current use as they approximate the properties that meet commercial application criteria. The glycol with absorbed water is regenerated and re-circulated into dehydration cycle for further water removal.
Chemically, glycol is an aliphatic organic compound belonging to the group of chemicals referred to as dihydric alcohols (diols). Physically, glycols are similar to water in that, they are colourless, clear and odourless liquids. They however possess greater specific gravity and viscosity than water at all temperatures and are soluble in water.
The four types of glycols that have been successfully used to dehydrate natural gas are;
Monoethylene glycol (MEG)
Diethylene glycol (DEG)
Triethylene glycol (TEG)
Tetraethylene glycol (T4EG)
Triethylene glycol has gained nearly universal acceptance as the most cost effective of the glycols due to superior dew point depression, operating cost and operation reliability.
Among the different gas dehydration processes, absorption dehydration is more economically attractive hence has become the most popular method.
1.2 STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
Gas dehydration is a common process in gas treatment plant because water in the presence of acid compounds in natural gas can cause corrosion; water also combines with hydrocarbons to form hydrates which can block valves and pipelines. During an absorption dehydration process of natural gas using tri-ethylene glycol, an appreciable quantity of glycol could be lost and a significant amount of volatile organic compounds emitted during regeneration which may be as a result of operational faults or inadequate plant design. Excessive loss of glycol may lower the efficiency of the dehydration process consequently increasing the cost of dehydrating the gas. VOCs emissions may raise concern from environmental regulatory bodies.
1.3 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
This project work is aimed at
1. Analyzing the basic process of gas dehydration using Triethylene Glycol.
2 Studying glycol regeneration process as well as examining the causes of associated glycol loss during the regeneration process with possible solutions proffered.
3. Examining the causes of Volatile organic compounds emission with possible solutions proffered.
1.4 SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS
1. Use of TEG for the dehydration of natural gas.
2. Investigating the Parameters affecting glycol regeneration.
3. Investigating the parameters influencing BTEX emissions.
1.5 METHODOLOGY
The various units of operation of the plant will be studied. Sensitivity analysis of process parameters such as temperature of inlet gas and inlet TEG, in relation to the degree of dehydration and BTEX emissions will be carried out. Previous works on the subject will also be examined.
1.6 CASE STUDY
The Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) gas compression and dehydration plant in Ughelli will be used as case study to achieve the major objectives of this research work.
HOW TO RECEIVE PROJECT MATERIAL(S)
After paying the appropriate amount (#5,000) into our bank Account below, send the following information to
08068231953 or 08168759420
(1) Your project topics
(2) Email Address
(3) Payment Name
(4) Teller Number
We will send your material(s) after we receive bank alert
BANK ACCOUNTS
Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI
Account Number: 0046579864
Bank: GTBank.
OR
Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI
Account Number: 3139283609
Bank: FIRST BANK
FOR MORE INFORMATION, CALL:
08068231953 or 08168759420
BEFORE YOU READ THE ABSTRACT OR CHAPTER ONE OF THE PROJECT TOPIC BELOW, PLEASE READ THE INFORMATION BELOW.THANK YOU!
INFORMATION:
YOU CAN GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT OF THE TOPIC BELOW. THE FULL PROJECT COSTS N5,000 ONLY. THE FULL INFORMATION ON HOW TO PAY AND GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT IS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE. OR YOU CAN CALL: 08068231953, 08168759420
WHATSAPP US ON 08137701720
GAS DEHYDRATION USING TRIETHYLENE GLYCOL (A CASE STUDY OF SHELL, UGHELI)
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
Background of the study
Natural gas is a combustible gaseous mixture of gaseous hydrocarbons, very light liquid hydrocarbons, free water, water vapour and other undesirable non – hydrocarbon gaseous and solid compounds found in conventional natural gas reservoirs as non-associated gas (NAG), as associated gas (AG) or as gas condensates.
Associated gas or gas-wellhead-gas is found in contact with oil in the reservoir and is produced with the oil and separated at the casing head or wellhead whereas non- associated gas contains little or no natural gas liquids (oil) at reservoir condition and it is termed dry gas or lean gas if the fluid at the surface still remains gas. However if the surface pressure cause some liquid hydrocarbon to evolve, it is called a wet gas or rich. Condensate occurs not as liquid or gas but as a very dense and high pressure fluid due to its high pressure and high temperature reservoir condition.
Natural gas may also occur in tight sands, tight shales, methane gas occluded in coal, as gas hydrates in geo-pressurized acquifer and as deep gas. These gases are more technologically difficult or more expensive to produce than conventional gas and are termed non- conventional natural gas.
Hydrocarbon majorly contained in the natural gas mixtures are methane and ethane which exist as gaseous components, propane and butane existing as volatile fluid, pentane, small amount of hexanes and heavier components existing as liquid components. Typical non- hydrocarbon which may exist in the gas stream are solid particles, water vapour or free water, mercury, formaldehyde, benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene (collectively referred to as BTEX), undesirable gases such as carbon oxides, sulfur gases and nitrogen oxides (collectively called acid gases), oxygen, helium and naturally occurring radioactive materials such as radon.
Table 1.0: Typical composition of Natural gas
Name Formula Volume (%)
Methane CH4 >85
Ethane C2H6 3-8
Propane C3H8 1-2
Butane C4H10 <1
Pentane C5H12 <1
Carbon dioxide CO2 1-2
Hydrogen sulfide H2O <1
Nitrogen N2 1-5
Helium He <0.5
Mercury Hg Traces
Benzene C6H6 Traces
Toulene C7H8 Traces
Xylene C6H4(CH3)2 Traces
Natural gas is a fossil fuel composed almost entirely of methane. The composition of natural gas varies depending on the field, formation, or reservoir from which it is extracted. Natural gas which contains acid gases above customer’s specification is termed sour gas while Natural gas containing acid gas below customer’s specification or no acid gas is termed sweet gas.
Natural gas is a fossil fuel formed by either the biogenic or thermogenic degradation of organic matter which has been accumulated over time within the earth’s crust. Biogenic mechanism involves shallow depth and low temperature decomposition of sedimentary organic matter by anaerobic bacterials whereas thermogenic mechanism involves deeper depth and high temperature thermal cracking of sedimentary matter or oil into gas. Natural gas being a fossil fuel is today, one of the most important fuels in our lives as it is the source of energy for household, industrial and commercial use, as well as to generate electricity.
Natural, associated or tail gas usually contains water, in liquid and/or vapour form, at source and/or as a result of sweetening with an acqueous solution. Operating experience and thorough engineering have proved that it is necessary to reduce and control the water content of gas to ensure safe processing and transmission. This is accomplished by the process of dehydration.
1.1 NATURAL GAS DEHYDRATION PROCESSES
Natural gas dehydration is the removal of water or water vapour from the natural gas stream. Free water in natural gas gives rise to difficulties in production, handling and transmission of natural gas. It is therefore necessary that water be removed from the gas stream as soon as possible.
There are several methods of dehydrating natural gas but the most common of these methods are:
(i)Refrigeration
(ii)Adsorption
(iii)Absorption
1.11 REFRIGERATION
This method employs cooling the natural gas to condense the water molecules to the liquid phase with the subsequent injection of inhibitor to prevent hydrate formation.
1.12 ADSORPTION
This is the removal of water from the gas stream by solid materials called desiccants which take in and hold water molecules within themselves by adhesive forces. Several types of solid desiccant used are silica gel, silica-based beads, activated alumina, activated bauxite, membranes and molecular sieves.
1.13 ABSORBTION
This is the process whereby water or water vapour is removed or absorbed from the gas stream by intimate contact with a liquid desiccant. Of all the liquid desiccants, the glycols have proved to be the most effective in current use as they approximate the properties that meet commercial application criteria. The glycol with absorbed water is regenerated and re-circulated into dehydration cycle for further water removal.
Chemically, glycol is an aliphatic organic compound belonging to the group of chemicals referred to as dihydric alcohols (diols). Physically, glycols are similar to water in that, they are colourless, clear and odourless liquids. They however possess greater specific gravity and viscosity than water at all temperatures and are soluble in water.
The four types of glycols that have been successfully used to dehydrate natural gas are;
Monoethylene glycol (MEG)
Diethylene glycol (DEG)
Triethylene glycol (TEG)
Tetraethylene glycol (T4EG)
Triethylene glycol has gained nearly universal acceptance as the most cost effective of the glycols due to superior dew point depression, operating cost and operation reliability.
Among the different gas dehydration processes, absorption dehydration is more economically attractive hence has become the most popular method.
1.2 STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
Gas dehydration is a common process in gas treatment plant because water in the presence of acid compounds in natural gas can cause corrosion; water also combines with hydrocarbons to form hydrates which can block valves and pipelines. During an absorption dehydration process of natural gas using tri-ethylene glycol, an appreciable quantity of glycol could be lost and a significant amount of volatile organic compounds emitted during regeneration which may be as a result of operational faults or inadequate plant design. Excessive loss of glycol may lower the efficiency of the dehydration process consequently increasing the cost of dehydrating the gas. VOCs emissions may raise concern from environmental regulatory bodies.
1.3 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
This project work is aimed at
1. Analyzing the basic process of gas dehydration using Triethylene Glycol.
2 Studying glycol regeneration process as well as examining the causes of associated glycol loss during the regeneration process with possible solutions proffered.
3. Examining the causes of Volatile organic compounds emission with possible solutions proffered.
1.4 SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS
1. Use of TEG for the dehydration of natural gas.
2. Investigating the Parameters affecting glycol regeneration.
3. Investigating the parameters influencing BTEX emissions.
1.5 METHODOLOGY
The various units of operation of the plant will be studied. Sensitivity analysis of process parameters such as temperature of inlet gas and inlet TEG, in relation to the degree of dehydration and BTEX emissions will be carried out. Previous works on the subject will also be examined.
1.6 CASE STUDY
The Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) gas compression and dehydration plant in Ughelli will be used as case study to achieve the major objectives of this research work.
HOW TO RECEIVE PROJECT MATERIAL(S)
After paying the appropriate amount (#5,000) into our bank Account below, send the following information to
08068231953 or 08168759420
(1) Your project topics
(2) Email Address
(3) Payment Name
(4) Teller Number
We will send your material(s) after we receive bank alert
BANK ACCOUNTS
Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI
Account Number: 0046579864
Bank: GTBank.
OR
Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI
Account Number: 3139283609
Bank: FIRST BANK
FOR MORE INFORMATION, CALL:
08068231953 or 08168759420